Upper extremity strength characteristics in female recreational tennis players with and without lateral epicondylalgia.

STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive, cross-sectional. OBJECTIVES: To compare static strength characteristics of the upper extremity musculature in female recreational tennis players with lateral epicondylalgia to those of nonsymptomatic tennis players and a control group of women who did not play tennis. BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of research describing the relationship between lateral epicondylalgia and strength characteristics of the upper extremity musculature, despite the functional relationship between the shoulder, elbow, and wrist. METHODS: Sixty-three women were recruited into 3 groups (n = 21 per group): symptomatic tennis players (STP) with lateral epicondylalgia, nonsymptomatic tennis players, and controls. Data collection was performed during a single session, during which the strength of selected muscle groups of the dominant upper extremity was measured using a combination of force transducers. Strength ratios of selected muscle groups were then calculated. RESULTS: The STP group reported median pain level of 3/10 on a numeric pain rating scale and a symptom duration of 16 weeks. The STP group had weaker lower trapezius strength (mean difference, -9.0 N; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -13.5, -4.4) and wrist extensor strength (-12.7 N; 95% CI: -24.4, -1.1), and a higher shoulder internal/external rotation strength ratio (0.19; 95% CI: 0.02, 0.35) and upper/lower trapezius strength ratio (1.32; 95% CI: 0.41, 2.23), compared to those of the nonsymptomatic group. Compared to the control group, the STP group demonstrated a significantly higher shoulder internal/external rotation strength ratio (0.21; 95% CI: 0.04, 0.38) and wrist flexion/extension strength ratio (0.14; 95% CI: 0.01, 0.27). CONCLUSION: In this group of recreational female tennis players, significant differences in strength and strength ratio characteristics were identified. Although the design of the study precludes establishing a cause-and-effect relationship, the results suggest further study and treatment of the muscle groups of interest.

The gross motor function classification system for cerebral palsy and single-event multilevel surgery: is there a relationship between level of function and intervention over time?

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine what effect, if any, an intervention such as Single-event multilevel orthopaedic surgery (SEMLS) might have on the relative stability of the gross motor function classification system (GMFCS) for cerebral palsy over a 5-year time period. METHODS: Eighty-four children with spastic cerebral palsy who underwent SEMLS were included. The patients had an average of 5.45 procedures during surgery. Mean age at the time of surgery was 6 years. Two blinded physical therapists applied the GMFCS to functional descriptions extracted from outpatient clinical records. The patients were rated preoperatively, 1, 2, and 5 years postoperatively. RESULTS: Interrater reliability was high, Kw=0.90. Friedman's nonparametric repeated measures analysis of variance was conducted comparing the GMFCS classification levels of the patients preoperatively and 1, 2, and 5 years after SEMLS. The patients as a group showed a significant change to a lower GMFCS classification postsurgery (P<0.001). Children classified at levels I and V of the GMFCS preoperatively showed lesser likelihood of changing functional levels postsurgery. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this investigation support the concept that interventions, especifically SEMLS, can affect the stability of the GMFCS classification. The majority of children in this study showed changes in gross motor function classification as reflected by lower GMFCS scores after SEMLS intervention. We also found that changes were maintained over a period of 5 years. The results of this study suggest that certain interventions, such as SEMLS, might have an effect on the stability of the GMFCS and that effect may be level-dependent. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective Study by Review of Medical Records. Level III in the Therapeutic Study investigating results of treatment category.

Test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change scores for the timed "up & go" test, the six-minute walk test, and gait speed in people with Alzheimer disease.

BACKGROUND: With the increasing incidence of Alzheimer disease (AD), determining the validity and reliability of outcome measures for people with this disease is necessary. OBJECTIVE: The goals of this study were to assess test-retest reliability of data for the Timed "Up & Go" Test (TUG), the Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), and gait speed and to calculate minimal detectable change (MDC) scores for each outcome measure. Performance differences between groups with mild to moderate AD and moderately severe to severe AD (as determined by the Functional Assessment Staging [FAST] scale) were studied. DESIGN: This was a prospective, nonexperimental, descriptive methodological study. METHODS: Background data collected for 51 people with AD included: use of an assistive device, Mini-Mental Status Examination scores, and FAST scale scores. Each participant engaged in 2 test sessions, separated by a 30- to 60-minute rest period, which included 2 TUG trials, 1 6MWT trial, and 2 gait speed trials using a computerized gait assessment system. A specific cuing protocol was followed to achieve optimal performance during test sessions. RESULTS: Test-retest reliability values for the TUG, the 6MWT, and gait speed were high for all participants together and for the mild to moderate AD and moderately severe to severe AD groups separately (intraclass correlation coefficients > or = .973); however, individual variability of performance also was high. Calculated MDC scores at the 90% confidence interval were: TUG=4.09 seconds, 6MWT=33.5 m (110 ft), and gait speed=9.4 cm/s. The 2 groups were significantly different in performance of clinical tests, with the participants who were more cognitively impaired being more physically and functionally impaired. LIMITATIONS: A single researcher for data collection limited sample numbers and prohibited blinding to dementia level. CONCLUSIONS: The TUG, the 6MWT, and gait speed are reliable outcome measures for use with people with AD, recognizing that individual variability of performance is high. Minimal detectable change scores at the 90% confidence interval can be used to assess change in performance over time and the impact of treatment.

Clinometric properties of the six-minute walk test in individuals undergoing rehabilitation poststroke.

The 6-minute walk test (6MWT) is commonly used to measure walking ability. The purpose of this study was to determine the test-retest reliability and concurrent and construct validity of the 6MWT in patients who were actively undergoing inpatient rehabilitation poststroke. Thirty-seven patients undergoing inpatient rehabilitation after a stroke participated; mean age was 66.3 years and mean time since stroke was 33.7 days. Patients underwent two 6MWT trials with 1-3 days between trials. Additional outcome measures taken were gait speed and the Functional Independence Measure (FIM). The 6MWT exhibited high test-retest reliability; ICC(2,1) 0.973 (95% CI=0.925-0.988) and a minimal detectable change (MDC(90)) of 54.1 m. The 6MWT was strongly to moderately correlated with gait speed (r=0.89), locomotion (walk) FIM (r=0.69), and motor FIM (r=0.52). The 6MWT is a clinically useful measure of walking ability poststroke. It is reliable and is related to other measures of walking ability and function that are commonly used during rehabilitation after stroke.

Dependence in prestroke mobility predicts adverse outcomes among patients with acute ischemic stroke.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Stroke survivors are commonly dependent in activities of daily living; however, the relation between prestroke mobility impairment and poststroke outcomes is poorly understood. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the association between prestroke mobility impairment and 4 poststroke outcomes. The secondary objective was to evaluate the association between prestroke mobility impairment and a plan for physical therapy. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of the National Stroke Project data, a retrospective cohort of Medicare beneficiaries who were hospitalized with an acute ischemic stroke (1998 to 2001). Logistic-regression modeling was used to examine the adjusted association between prestroke mobility impairment with patient outcomes and a plan for physical therapy. RESULTS: Among the 67,445 patients hospitalized with an ischemic stroke, 6% were dependent in prestroke mobility. Prestroke mobility dependence was independently associated with an increased odds of poststroke mobility impairment (odds ratio [OR]=9.9; 95% CI, 9.0 to 10.8); in-hospital mortality (OR=2.4; 95% CI, 2.2 to 2.7); discharge to a skilled nursing facility (OR=3.5; 95% CI, 3.2 to 3.8); and the combination of in-hospital death or discharge to a skilled nursing facility (OR=3.5; 95% CI, 3.3 to 3.8). Prestroke mobility dependence was independently associated with a decreased odds of having a plan for physical therapy (OR=0.79; 95% CI, 0.73 to 0.85). CONCLUSIONS: These data, obtained from a large, geographically diverse cohort from the United States, demonstrate a strong association between dependence in prestroke mobility and adverse outcomes among elderly stroke patients. Clinicians should screen patients for prestroke mobility impairment to identify patients at greatest risk for adverse events.

Test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change of gait speed in individuals undergoing rehabilitation after stroke.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Gait speed is commonly used to assess walking ability in persons with stroke. Previous research related to the psychometric properties of gait speed has been conducted primarily with individuals who were able to walk independently and/or were in the later stages of recovery after stroke. The purpose of this research was to examine the test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change (MDC90) of gait speed in individuals with stroke who required varying levels of assistance to ambulate during rehabilitation. METHODS: Patients who could ambulate with or without physical assistance and were undergoing inpatient rehabilitation were recruited. Gait speed was measured over the middle five meters of a nine-meter walk at a comfortable pace. Data were analyzed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC2,1) and the MDC90. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients who were a mean 34.5 (standard deviation = 17.7) days post-stroke agreed to participate. For all the subjects combined, the ICC2,1 was 0.862 and MDC90 was 0.30 m/sec. For the 13 subjects who required physical assistance to walk, the ICC2,1 = 0.971 and MDC90 = 0.07 m/sec. For the 22 subjects who could walk without physical assistance, the ICC2,1 = 0.80 and MDC90 = 0.36 m/sec. DISCUSSION: Gait speed is a reliable measure of walking ability for a wide variety of patients undergoing rehabilitation after stroke. Gait speed is more sensitive to change in patients who require physical assistance to walk than in those who can walk without assistance. A change of more than 0.30 m/sec may be necessary in order to determine whether a change in gait speed exceeds measurement error and patient variability.

Reliability of the dynamic gait index in people with vestibular disorders.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the interrater reliability of the Dynamic Gait Index (DGI) when used with patients with vestibular disorders and with previously published instructions. DESIGN: Correlational study. SETTING: Outpatient physical therapy clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Subjects included 30 patients (age range, 27-88y) with vestibular disorders, who were referred for vestibular rehabilitation. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects' performance on the DGI was concurrently rated by 2 physical therapists experienced in vestibular rehabilitation to determine interrater reliability. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Percentage agreement, kappa statistics, and the ratio of subject variability to total variability were calculated for individual DGI items. Kappa statistics for individual items were averaged to yield a composite kappa score of the DGI. Total DGI scores were evaluated for interrater reliability by using the Spearman rank-order correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Interrater reliability of individual DGI items varied from poor to excellent based on kappa values (kappa range,.35-1.00). Composite kappa values showed good overall interrater reliability (kappa=.64) of total DGI scores. The Spearman rho demonstrated excellent correlation (r=.95) between total DGI scores given concurrently by the 2 raters. CONCLUSION: DGI total scores, administered by using the published instructions, showed moderate interrater reliability with subjects with vestibular disorders. The DGI should be used with caution in this population at this time, because of the lack of strong reliability.

Application of the HOAC II: an episode of care for a patient with low back pain.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The HOAC II is a patient management algorithm designed, in part, to provide a conceptual framework for patient management for any type of patient seen by physical therapists. This case report illustrates how the HOAC II can be used in clinical practice. CASE DESCRIPTION: The patient was a 47-year-old woman with low back pain. The report describes the patient's examination, evaluation, diagnosis, prognosis, intervention, and outcomes within the context of the HOAC II. OUTCOME: The patient had measurable improvements in impairments, functional limitation, and disability following an intervention designed to resolve her impairments and functional limitations. DISCUSSION: This case report illustrates how the HOAC II can be used to assist in the management of a patient from admission to discharge. The report also demonstrates how use of a disablement model can add clarity to patient care.

The Hypothesis-Oriented Algorithm for Clinicians II (HOAC II): a guide for patient management.

In this era of health care accountability, a need exists for a new decision-making and documentation guide in physical therapy. The original Hypothesis-Oriented Algorithm for Clinicians (HOAC) provided clinicians and students with a framework for science-based clinical practice and focused on the remediation of functional deficits and how changes in impairments related to these deficits. The HOAC II was designed to address shortcomings in the original HOAC and be more compatible with contemporary practice, including the Guide to Physical Therapist Practice. Disablement terminology is used in the HOAC II to guide clinicians and students when documenting patient care and incorporating evidence into practice. The HOAC II, like the HOAC, can be applied to a patient regardless of age or disorder and allows for identification of problems by physical therapists when patients are not able to communicate their problems. A feature of the HOAC II that was lacking in the original algorithm is the concept of prevention and how to justify and document interventions directed at prevention.